WHEN THE EXTRAORDINARY BECOMES ORDINARY
There was a time when a European heatwave made headlines because it was extraordinary. But those times are clearly gone. What was once the exception is steadily becoming the norm.
Case in point; the only, just behind us, June heatwave demonstrated that extreme temperatures are no longer simply about discomfort, they created sizeable destruction. Across Europe, newspapers tell heartbreaking stories of children dying after being left in parked cars. City fountains have become places of refuge. Schools have closed early. Train services have been cancelled as rails buckle beneath the heat. Hospitals have postponed procedures.
Millions of visitors were affected as some of the continent’s most iconic landmarks were forced to alter their operations. In Paris the Eiffel Tower closed early, the Louvre Museum, the world’s most visited museum, shortened its opening hours, the Arc de Triomphe reduced access, and outdoor attractions at Disneyland Paris were suspended. Across the channel, the ceremonial Changing of the Guard at Buckingham and Windsor Palaces in the UK were cancelled to protect both visitors and staff.
Further away, yet united by the same climate crises, more than 185 million people across the United States were placed under heat alerts. The extreme conditions forced the cancellation or postponement of major Independence Day celebrations marking the nation’s 250th anniversary and prompted FIFA to review World Cup match times and player rehydration protocols.
As Europe now braces for its third major heatwave, before the first weeks of summer have even passed, Red Alerts are once again flashing across our phones. Across the Atlantic, much of the United States is sweltering beneath extreme temperatures. The geography differs. The story does not.
This is no longer the story of another heatwave. It is the story of what we are beginning to accept as normal.
Just two weeks ago, it felt as though all of Geneva had stepped into the Rhône. Families floated downstream. Teenagers leapt from bridges. Office workers, still in their shirts and trousers, stripped to their underwear before entering the water after work. Everyone searching for the same thing. Relief. During that week, London too seemed to be melting. My son called after returning from buying his fifth fan. Even with every window open, his apartment had become a sauna. Sleep had become elusive. Concentration almost impossible.
And so, once again, conversations no longer begin with, “How are you?”, but instead, “How hot is it where you are?”
Not that long ago, temperatures approaching 40°C belonged somewhere else. They defined distant deserts rather than European summers. Today, that distinction no longer exists. London. Paris. Geneva. Zurich. Even villages in the Alps, once defined by cool evenings and crisp mountain air, are experiencing temperatures that would once have seemed almost impossible.
Daily life is reorganising itself around a hotter world. Cities are adapting. Homes are adapting. Businesses are adapting. Increasingly, so too are our expectations. Increasingly, the public debate is no longer about preventing climate change but about living with it. More air conditioning. Stronger infrastructure. Better ways to endure longer, hotter summers. Necessary conversations, certainly. But, we risk accepting as inevitable what still remains within our power to influence.
Just last month, I wrote about a ski lift in Braunwald, Switzerland, closing because winter can no longer reliably sustain it. That story was about a disappearing winter. This one is about an arriving summer. They are not separate events. They are additional chapters of the same story.
For more than three decades, Europe has been warming faster than any other continent on Earth. Temperatures have risen at more than twice the global average. Human activity continues to trap more heat in the atmosphere, while Europe’s unique geography amplifies the consequences.
The Arctic is losing the sea ice that once reflected sunlight back into space. Darker oceans absorb more heat. Snow cover is shrinking. Even the jet stream, the great river of air that usually carries cool Atlantic weather across Europe is changing, allowing vast high-pressure systems to become trapped over the continent, holding heat in place not for days, but increasingly lasting for weeks.
The science is complex. Its consequences however are not. And nowhere are they more visible than in Europe’s glaciers. After just two early-season 2026 heatwaves, much of last winter’s protective snowfall across the Alps had already disappeared more than a month earlier than normal. The ice beneath, once insulated from the summer sun, now lies unprotected.
The glaciers are no longer simply melting. They are being stripped bare. Scientists report that their melt rates already resemble those now accepted at the end of August, not the beginning of July. This matters beyond the mountains. Europe’s glaciers are not simply magnificent landscapes. They are frozen reservoirs, supplying water for cities, agriculture, hydropower, industry and even the cooling of nuclear power stations. As they retreat, they are not merely changing the vistas of the Alps. They are reshaping Europe’s long-term water security.
Unlike a wildfire or a flood, glaciers do not announce their disappearance. They retreat, metre by metre, summer by summer. There are no sirens. No breaking news. No single day when we realise what has been lost. Until that one morning when we look up and discover that something we believed would outlast us has just, literally, slipped away.
Perhaps that is what alarms me most. Our response has become almost entirely practical. Drink more water. Check on elderly neighbours. Keep children indoors. Close the shutters. Buy another fan. Every recommendation, sensible. Every recommendation may save lives.
Yet our conversation has clearly shifted. Gradually, we ask how to live with a hotter world rather than how urgently to prevent it. Our conversation is shifting from preventing change, to managing it. And from solving the problem, to learning how to live with it.
When we do debate the causes, the discussion too often descends into a familiar transatlantic blame game. Some Europeans point to America’s emissions. Some Americans point to Europe’s reluctance to embrace air conditioning. Yet both arguments reduce a far more difficult existential challenge to little more than an engineering problem or an ideological debate, when the reality is that climate change demands both adaptation and mitigation.
We have become increasingly adept at managing the consequences. Far less willing to confront the causes. Leadership is measured not simply by how well we adapt to change, but by whether we retain the resolve to shape its direction. Perhaps climate change is unlike any challenge humanity has ever faced because everyone experiences its consequences, yet responsibility is so easily transferred somewhere else.
Nations point across oceans. Political parties point across the aisle. Industries point at consumers. Consumers point at governments. Meanwhile, the atmosphere keeps no score. And while we argue, something even more fundamental is at work. Nature does not negotiate. It does not compromise. It does not respond to opinion polls, election cycles or political ideology. It responds only to the immutable laws of physics.
Every generation inherits a new definition of what is normal. We measure change not against history, but against our own memories. Children born today may grow up believing that forty-degree European summers, disappearing glaciers and rivers full of people escaping the heat are simply what summer has always looked like. That may be climate change’s quietest victory, the gradual redefinition of what we accept as routine.
Of course, adaptation is essential. Communities must protect the vulnerable. Cities must become more resilient. Infrastructure must evolve. But adaptation cannot become our destination. Humanity has always adapted. The danger is allowing adaptation to replace ambition. Air conditioning can cool a room. Museums can shorten their opening hours. Landmarks can close their gates. Sporting events can be rescheduled. But none of these can rebuild a glacier, restore a river, revive a failed harvest, cool a forest, preserve biodiversity. Nor can they protect the millions whose livelihoods that depend on working outdoors.
There is a profound difference between learning to live with a problem versus deciding to solve it. If every record-breaking summer becomes another season to manage, we risk accepting as inevitable what still remains, at least partly, within our power to change
Perhaps that is the greatest danger of all. Not the heat. Not even the records. But the lowering of our expectations. Too many ignore or still speak of climate change as though it belongs to tomorrow. Yet tomorrow rarely arrives with large fanfare. It arrives, silently.
Another cancelled train. Another glacier retreating. Another river running lower.
The future is no longer approaching. It is already here. Nature does not negotiate. It responds only to the immutable laws of physics. And Mother Nature will continue to try to teach us the hard lessons, pushing us to act because she knows that the decisions we make today will shape tomorrow’s new normal, and that of generations to come.
The question is not whether we know enough or if climate change is happening. It is whether we are willing to act before today’s extraordinary becomes tomorrow’s ordinary.